This is a terrible and obviously stupid plan. It is tantamount to bombing the Grand Canyon or Yosemite! Don't do it. PLEASE don't allow the Navy or anyone to despoil the beautiful, pristine San Antonio Valley. Lyle H. Wilkinson Santa Ynez, CA I beg of you, do not violate this sacred ground. Tiiu Lukk Santa Monica, CA I know this area. As a boy I hiked this lovely area. As a young soldier, I grew to love these hills and grasslands as I trained to become an infantryman. If you have not had the good fortune to experience this country as I have, suffice to say that it is very much as California was at the time the Spanish missionaries explored and constructed missions the length of California. Plaese don't trash this lovely area with a bombing range. Mitchell Cushman, Ph.D. San Diego, CA	The San Antonio Valley is part of our natural heritage and should be preserved to be enjoyed by our children and grandchildren. On account of the unique wildlife and the immediate national forest area, you must do all you can to prevent a naval bombing site from being built. Thank you for your time and I look forward to your reply. Naomi Hamburger Davis, CA   I have had 2 sons in the USMC, so I understand and support the need for practice. However, I do not agree that the San Antonio Valley is the place for this. We need this space to balance with the wonderful might of nature. Ann McDonald Rice Los Gatos, CA   Pleae don't do it. Look what it did to Fort Ord. The beauty of the area, the spiritual meaning it has, and the threat to wildlife and flora makes it imaginable that anyone could even consider it. Find a place if you must that doesn't have these impacts. J. Sayler San Jose, CA
I have lived in the San Antonio valley for 5 years. We moved in when the fort was decommisioned. We felt the amount of noise generated by the Army would be cut considerably. This has been anything but true. During the summer months the base is a consistent source of noise. What ever happened to disturbing then peace. We have had 6 helicopters flying 50 ft above our house executing canyon manuvers. Now you want to turn our pristine valley into Bagdad. How many dead endangered species does it take to keep them protected? I recall a farmer who was treated like a murderer for killing a kangaroo rat. As usual the government is above the law. Lockwood has grown at a tremendous rate since we moved in. If the Navy can't avoid a Japenese trawler in the vast ocean how can we expect them not to bomb our homes, our resources and our endangered species. Bomb Washington instead. Wynn McGrenera King City, Ca	The Big Sur wilderness area is a tremendous natural resource to the Nation. Its flora, fauna, and environment are precious treasures, ones that all of us need to work to protect. Endangered species such as condors and our national bird the Bald Eagle have established habitats in the region, and migrating animals make use of the area on their way up and down the Pacific Coast. It would be a tremendous shame and a needless waste of natural resources if you were to proceed with your plan to establish a jet fighter bombing range here. I am most strongly opposed to the proposal. Barbara Nesbet, Member Monte Sereno City Council Monte Sereno, CA   I have had the horrible, heart-stopping experience of having those jets fly over me in Big Sur. I am not as worried about the hermitage as I am about the adverse effects of that reckless behavoir on the wildlife in the area. Barbara McKenna Santa Cruz, CA
To intrude on this most unique wilderness with screaming jets is unthinkable. Lydia Walker Cambria Ca.   The proposed bombing test flights are an OUTRAGE to the fragile natural environment of the Big Sur coast. US citicens deserve a Wilderness area there, instead. David Steindl-Rast, Ph.D. Ithaca/NY	Stop this crime against our environment. We need to preserve not destroy our pristine valleys. It makes me hurt to think what this will do to both the plant and animal life if this is allowed to go forward. Kathy Olmstead Palo Alto, CA     It is an inappropriate choice of sites for such activity. The MBNMS and the Ventana Wilderness are treasures that should be protected and respected, not defiled. Carole Adams Cambria, CA

The plan proposes to bomb the heart of the California wilderness, an area of inestimable cultural and ecological value. To bomb this habitat would be an act of aggression and desecration against America itself: our land, our people, and our future. Quintan Ana Wikswo San Francisco CA Surely there are less noise sensitive areas over which you could fly your planes. I fear that given this new administration, all of the good and thoughtful attention the military has paid to public opinion will vanish. I do hope that this will not be the case. PLEASE do not destroy the priceless silence, beauty and biodiversity which currently exisits in the San Antonio Valley. vie frost Lake Oswego, OR as a Benedictine monk of Christ in the Desert, NM, that silence and solitude and peayer are more needed for the wellbeing and security of our nation than the noise and distruction of a bombing range. Br. Bernard Cranor, O.S.B. Damage caused by bombing will last for many more generations than the goals of the generals ordering military readiness. Please consider the long view for this land that is home to forms of life that we all need for our survival. Bill Prange Sebastopol, Ca This would be a disaster. we frequently visit this pristine area...to have the intrusion of jet bombers is an outrage. Jim and Ann Ameling New Haven, Ct. This would make about as much sense as paying $600.00 for toilet seats. The worst run business in the country seems to be the government. Who thought this one up? greg jordan	This seems to be another example of military spending out of control. Have we lost all common sense? Peter Coster Sonoma, CA
	What can I add to all the letters opposing this action?! The San Antonio Valley is nestled in an area of vast beauty. Add to that its geographical, botanical, biological, and historical significance and you have not only a crime against nature, but a crime against humanity in the making. PLEASE DO NOT LET THE SAN ANTONIO VALLEY BECOME A MILITARY CASUALITY! STOP the bombing plan NOW! Carol Campbell Scotts Valley CA
	California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter, has been studying the flora of Fort Hunter Liggett and working to protect it for over 25 years. We would like to ask that the following issues be examined thoroughly in the Environmental Assessment for the proposed practice bombing activity now being scoped. If, as seems likely, the impacts are found to be significant, then an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared as provided under NEPA. 1. Presence of Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants: Because we have never been permitted to visit Stony Valley, site of the proposed project, we are unfamiliar with the flora of the site. We understand that the Floristic Survey carried out recently also did not include Stony Valley. Therefore we ask that a survey by qualified academics be carried out so as to cover the long blooming period at FHL. We are aware that a rare member of the mustard family, Streptanthus albidus ssp. peramoenus, was collected there by Alice Eastwood (later Curator of Botany at the California Academy of Sciences) in 1897. We also know that there are a number of vernal pools in Stony Valley that could well support rare species found elsewhere at FHL. The Floristic Survey of FHL contains a list (pp. 32-33) of the 57 plant species of concern that should be considered in the survey. 2. Impacts on Wildlife: In our effort to preserve intact ecosystems, we recognize the importance of protecting such species as the bald eagle, California condor, kit fox, arroyo toad, red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, and other sensitive species described in the document which we co-authored in 1997, 'Fort Hunter Liggett Natural resources Conservation Report.' For example, the diversity of breeding birds at FHL has been shown to be higher than any other site in southern Monterey Co. 3. Impacts on nearby Wilderness Areas: Our members have been visiting the Ventana and Silver Peak Wilderness Areas for many years (Silver Peak was only designated a few years ago, but it has always been a de facto wilderness) for nature study, recreation, and solitude. The area is known to attract visitors from all over the country and beyond for its spectacular scenery, extraordinary biological values, and unspoiled natural condition. The impact on these activities is not easy to measure, but it is likely to be significant, resulting in economic losses to surrounding communities. Further, both government agencies and local and national conservation groups are in the process of spending substantial millions of dollars to acquire inholdings to preserve and protect the natural values of the Santa Lucia Mountains. These organizations should be contacted about potential impacts on their efforts. 4. Impacts on Native American and Archeological Sites: If as little is known about these subjects in Stony Valley as about the native flora, then surveys must be carried out to determine what might be at risk from errant practice bombs or from the noise alone. There are a number of studies of damage to indian ruins in the southwest from the shock waves from low-flying aircraft. 5. Health Impacts: There is a growing body of studies on the impacts on human and wildlife health from excessive noise. Decibel studies should be conducted by a qualified expert to determine the level at various sensitive points. We appreciate the opportunity to comment at the scoping stage of this project, and we look forward to receiving a copy of the EA or EIS. Mary Ann Matthews Conservation Chair, Monterey County Chapter, California Native Plant Society   As a regular visitor to the Big Sur area, I am totally opposed to this jet fighter bombing range in the San Antonio Valley. The area is one of quiet and solitude, a place to retreat for spiritual renewal. A bombing range is totally out of character with the area. Its unacceptable to myself and my family and friends. The peace and quiet of the area must not be disturbed. (Not to mention theecological impact!) Deborah Hayes Santa Cruz, CA
It seems impossible to me that the new bombing range can be made compatible with existing federal law regarding protection of natural environment, civilian populations, etc. I hope a concerted public effort will bring to light the illegitimacy of this bombing-range project. Rev. Thomas Matus New Camaldoli Big Sur CA Our country has had two hundred short years in which to establish a history. Part of that history is in it's beauty and natural environment. Isn't it enough what the government did to the desert outside of Las Vegas? Isn't it enough that people for many years to come will pay the price for the A-bomb testing? Leave our natural resources and wonders alone. Ruth C. Tait Rosamond, CA This area is rare, relativley clean space, a sanctuary for both human and non-human animals, as well as countless species of plants. Surely there must be a less treasured space to bomb! Jude Todd, PhD Santa Cruz This an outrageous example of insensitivity to native American heritage and to the truly glorious Big Sur region. No, no, no Ann Lievers Escondido, Ca. We are responsible for the earth. we are responsible to leave it as purely perfect as is possible for the generations that follow us. Sr Patricia Kelly ocd Carmelite Monastery Reno Nv San Antonio Valley is a sacred place. The strong cultural history, natural beauty, and biodiversity of the area warrant immunity from the proposed invasion of the Navy. Laurel Lucia Whitnah Oakland, CA I have great respect for the military,having worn the uniform myself; find another place to make war and leave people in peace. Tom McMahon SanJose,Ca. 95136   San Antonio Valley is a place of exquisite natural beauty and biodiversity, the navy plan for a bombing range would seriously imperil this. We urge you not to proceed in this destructive direction, and instead, support the protective stewardship this land deserves. Diana Deering and Susan Burgers Aptos, Ca
	This is a beautiful place of quiet and untouched nature and should not be disturbed by war practice. christine meyer Fremont, CA
As a former military officer, military writer, aerospace editor, investigative reporter and now a just plain concerned citizen, I strongly oppose opening the Fort Hunter Liggett Western Training Center to naval air-to-surface ordnance launches from supersonic FA/18 Hornet strike fighters based at the Lemoore Naval Air Station near Fresno. I object for these important reasons. First, the potential danger to the environment and fragile wildlife from air operations is real. Secondly, the Big Sur environs between Lucia on the Coast and the Jolon perimeter of the Army training center is one of the most beautiful wild areas in America. It must continue to be fully protected for future generations. Many concerned citizens have volunteered innumerable hours to carefully nurture Bald Eagle and Condor chicks back into the wild from where they once thrived. They have succeeded dramatically at this difficult task despite the odds. We should not accept outside inroads to these efforts. Finally, and most importantly, one more naval weapons range is simply not needed. There are weapon test ranges at Fallon, Nevada, and in California's El Centro. The Lemoore Naval Air Station uses both for tactical aviation training. There is also nearby China Lake operated by the Navy. The China Lake Naval Air Weapons Center embraces 1,700 sq. miles, including two remote and secure test ranges with restricted air and land space. Here, pilots enjoy 353 flying days a year. Lemoore is 111 nautical miles from China Lake, 70 nautical miles from Fort Hunter Liggett and 196 nautical miles from Fallon. Is this net savings of 40 nautical miles and associated jet fuel (China Lake vis- à- vis Liggett) worth the environmental impact to surrounding Fort Hunter Liggett environs? In this age of environmental awareness and sensitivity, I don't think so. Fort Hunter Liggett's 260 sq. mile footprint covers a significantly smaller 165,000 acres than China Lake's 1.1 million acres and unlike China Lake is subject to coastal fog. The China Lake weapon ranges were set aside for sorties, aerodynamic rocket sled tests and other air weapons testing. Both of these test ranges are vastly larger in total area than Fort Hunter Liggett. And further south is the restricted area around Edwards Air Force Base, the immense Fort Irwin National Training Center and the Marine Corps Training Center -- other sites providing possible alternatives to Fort Hunter Liggett. Beyond environmental concerns, access to Mission San Antonio de Padua, located inside the Fort Hunter Liggett reservation near Jolon, should not be jeopardized. Mission San Antonio de Padua is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The cultural richness of California's 21 missions should be available at all times for all citizens, including school children who regularly study this rich piece of California heritage as part of their required curriculum. What naval air combat operations would do to limit access to Mission San Antonio and the winding road to the coast today is not known. These concerns should be thoroughly probed during public hearings, along with potential species environmental impacts from sonic boom and air-launched ordnance mishaps. The 17-mile drive from the Mission through Hunter Liggett to Big Sur is a trip not to be missed. Bald Eagles and Condors, increasingly rare, can be observed, if one is lucky, along this remarkable journey through the Ventana Wilderness. It is a moving ethereal experience that we should savor and not pollute with overhead noise. The Navy's air arm absolutely needs to be combat ready and agile able in weapons deployment. As cited, there are less at-risk geographic alternatives than Fort Hunter Liggett that can be targeted to achieve the required "go for it" state of readiness rather than threatening the delicate balance of nature in a pristine California wilderness area. The Navy should stand down and leave the Big Sur environs and its small endangered flock of feathered fliers at peace. Walt Keeshen, Jr.	I am a teacher in California, and I love my crazy job. Some of my family is military and I recognize the need for your practices. However, I was deeply saddened by your recent choice to establish a jet fighter bombing range in Big Sur. I escape to this pristine, peaceful wilderness on a regular basis for tranquility and spiritual connectedness to our Earth. It is an area that is truly a gift from God, unspoiled by our current reality. This type of military practice has no place in Big Sur. I have been all over the world. It is still, and probably always will be my favorite because of its unique, solitary quality that I have not seen or felt anywhere else. Please reexamine your options and make the right choice. Big Sur is dear to to many folks. Thank you. Molly Behrens Vacaville, Ca
	Do not do this!!!! The Big Sur area is one of the few places one can go for peace. Many retreat facilities and religious institutions have ended up there for that very reason and offer hospitality to folks who also need that respite. Fly the stuff over LA; no one will notice. Michael Wyatt Seattle, WA
	This would be obscene. Kay McMullen Redwood City CA
	It is just absurd. Nothing more needs to be said. The facts speak for themselves. Carlos Venegas Los Angeles, CA
	I think it is outrageous to take this pristine wilderness that over the years has been so protected and allow it to be used for such an unconscious purpose. Do not let this happen. I oppose it. Joseph Stern Aptos, CA
	Conducting thousands of bombing sorties over one of the most pristine and beautiful wilderness areas left in the United States would be an unthinkable misuse of public land. You may count on vigorous and resolute opposition. Randy Fry Carmel,
	I strongly feel that this area should be preserved for its very special natural history, geological, biological and cultural attributes. To disturb this area and its unique inhabitants with screaming jets would be a crime. Kari Olsen Santa Cruz, CA
	For this plan to be carried through would be truly catastrophic. The wild places are so few, please respect their peace. Debbie Baskerville Brooklyn, NY
	I urge you not to proceed with the proposal to establish a jet fighter bombing training range in San Antonio Valley. V.Smith-Raymond Aptos, CA
	This is a proposal for biological and environmental disaster. Suzanne L. Lukes San Pedro, CA
	This is an awful idea. Beila Krow Soquel, CA   This seems to be another example of military spending out of control. Have we lost all common sense? Peter Coster Sonoma, CA
Please do not build a jet bomber training site in the San Antonio Valley. To do so would destroy the silence and solitude of one of the most beautiful and serene places in the world - the Camaldolese Hermitage at Big Sur. The monks and their retreat guests would suffer the loss of one of the last quiet places on the face of the planet if the jet training facility were to be built. Rich Conway Littleton, CO	I live almost at the top of the coastal mountains between Morro Bay and Atascadero just above Devils Gap, which is a flyway for these Navy planes. They only fly through once or twice a week but when they come through all life stops until they pass. I can see the rivets on the wings and if I'm up on top I am looking down on the planes which by the way is what happens if you are up on Cone or Twin Peaks. THESE ARE THE SAME PLANES. I just happen to know the ex-commander of the NAS in Lemoore and he was the guy who designed the flight path these jets are presently using. Yes this is the same flight path that goes around the Cone/Twin Peaks area. When the come up the HWY 41 canyon they are on their way back to Lemoore. My point is these flights are going to affect a lot greater area and many more people than anyone at this point in time realizes. John Smida
Big Sur is one of the most incredible treasures of our nation.San Antonio Valley is also an incredibly beautiful area filled with a profusion biodiversity. The best use for this area would be a National Park, not a bombing range. Please help stop this madness before we lose yet another irreplaceable part of our country. Dee Roe Santa Cruz, Ca

In the last few days, we have read in the news of the tragic deaths of nine Japanese people in a large boat when the U.S. Navy nuclear submarine USS Greeneville (with civilian VIPs at the helm and other key controls, under supervision ---- supposedly) made a special sudden emergence from the sea as part of training expercises while on maneuvers. Ret.Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan is quoted in the L.A TIMES as saying: "To be practicing that kind of maneuver...was obviously being done for publicity purposes. It obviously wasn't a training exercise...." Cmdr. Greg Smith at the Pentagon is quoted as follows: "Those [submariners] are skippers who love what they do. There is no shortage of ego in showing off the capability of their boats and their crews." Tragically, we also recall irresponsibly low-flying fighter planes in Italy on training maneuvers in the last couple of years hitting civilian structures and killing and damaging many. What do these incidents tell us? First, that we must strongly reaffirm that the military is meant to be the servant of U.S. [and even foreign] civilians in our republic; we are not a military-run society (although President Eisenhower warned us about the arrogance and potential dangers of "the [frightening] military/industrial complex" before he left office as one of our greatest challenges to contain in the future, given its present size and power. While Navy fighter-bomber planes obviously need to go out on training maneuvers, nevertheless there seems no need to be contemptuous of civilian rights and needs, as well as the special peace and beauty and ecology, in such precious and unique areas as Big Sur, California and Stony Valley of the San Antonio Valley (where a bombing range is being considered for construction, incredibly enough). I plead with you (as someone who, with his wife, has often enjoyed the special charms of this geographic treasure-land) to reconsider such a move. Military needs can be met elsewhere, surely, where they do not infringe upon civilian and ecological rights! I think that President (General of the Army) Eisenhower was quite correct in warning us about the potential for future military lack of consideration for SERVICE TO, not SERVICE AGAINST, civilians and their incomparable (but fragile) ecological and geographic wonders near the central coast of California. My own father was a proud disabled Navy veteran of WW II, and I do not harbor any ill will toward our military (especially our Navy) , but I am adamantly opposed (along with my wife and daughter) to the erection of such a bombing range in this place and to fighter-bomber maneuvers in this area; only harm and potential accidents can be the result. Thank you for your consideration of these frank, but respectful, views. Thomas J. Elliott, Ph.D. Claremont, CA	In many ways, Big Sur is synonymous with that powerful and almost mystical part of Northern California that makes this area so special. As a backpacker, I have seen, and felt, firsthand why the extraordinary beauty and atmosphere of this area is so world renowned. While it is certainly important that our armed forces remain in a state of preparedness, it is hard to imagine using a more treasured place than Big Sur area for this. Unlike the current use of the military reservation there, a bombing range would make military activity utterly intrusive to the rest of the Ventana Wilderness--shattering its tranquility and upsetting its ecosystem. I strongly urge that local input on this issue be taken seriously and that the plans for a bombing range in the Big Sur area be rejected. Terrence Kelly San Francisco, CA this is a direspectful invasion of the silence of the camaldolese hermitage and the environment. ed lucie encino ca More and more we need to consider the other life-forms and the land around us--if we think we are going to have healthy people on a sick earth in the future--we are very short-sighted. Please take the long view and reconsider this project. Thank you! Sister Susan Blomstad, OSF Malibu, CA
	Currently, this country is trying to repair counless mistakes concerning the environment. What our predecessors found to be imperative has now been concluded to be a costly error in judgement. In many cases, the damage that has been done cannot be undone. There are countless species of creatures brought to the brink of extinction and once gone they cannot be returned. There are some who believe that through advances in genetics extinction will not be a concern. It is the epitome of arrogance to assume that humans can take the place of God. We are destroying what is left of the natural beauty of this earth and the balance of what keeps us alive. To continue in this vein would be to head towards our own destruction. With economies so uncertain , is it really safe to assume that we will have the time or funding to repair the damage that will be done? And what natural element, once completely destroyed has ever been restored to its original glory? Lisa Levine Thousand Oaks, CA
I have lived in Big Sur for 35 years and believe it is a conflict of purpose for there to be ANY increase in ANY Armed Forces use in the area. The 'savings' you expect to gain by 'practicing' here would be far offset by the COST to the wilderness and the people and critters that reside here. I suggest you 'take a hike', LITERALLY, to and around the place you wish to use, having as guides some of us who know this place and call it home! YOU CAN NOT DO WHAT YOU PLAN TO DO WITHOUT IT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THIS AREA AND DISTURBING THE NATURALNESS, PEACE, AND BEAUTY HERE. PLEASE RECONSIDER!! Tzila "Z" Duenzl Monterey, CA	We need to save this valuable and sensitive area. Please cancel plans to use it for a bombing range Richard NIchols Sebastopol CA The homeland of the Salinan Indians should not have to endure jet fighter bombing. This land needs to be preserved for future generations to enjoy for its particularly beautiful and historical landscape. I'm sure that once the Navy thinks about it, it will withdraw. Lois Robin Santa Cruz, CA
I am a concerned citizen who has often enjoyed the scenic beauty of the Monterey area coastline. I am very disturbed to hear of the proposal for a bombing range on the Fort Hunter-Liggett base. I know from a backpackers perspective, the destructive impact flyovers can do to one's experience of the wilderness. Hiking in areas of the Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park, I have witnessed dangerous antics of pilots doing low altitude flyovers of mountain passes, far outside the confines of their Nevada base - dangerous, not to the pilots, but to hikers climbing the passes. The military has consistantly denied these low-altitude flights, even when park rangers have called in with the jets id numbers. Given this precedent, I find it difficult if not impossible to believe that any 'environmental impact assessment' performed by an agency contracted by the military, would yield results with a valid perspective, or take into account the effect that flyovers would have on the wilderness area of the Ventana. More likely it would attempt to ignore all but the most obvious, the impact area itself. Base Commander LTC Ackman's quote: "Can we accommodate the target location, which is something on the order of 10 acres? The answer from our perspective would generally be yes. But the Navy needs to do an environmental assessment." is a very disturbing one. It's apparent from this statement that this senior ranking officer believes the environmental assessment process is simply a rubber stamp to approval. I do not want one of the most precious coastal areas of the world turned into a practice area for the Navy's top guns. I stand firmly against this proposal in any shape or form it may take. Kiran Turan Oakland, CA	Destruction of the biodiversity in this part of the central coast would have damaging consequesces for the flora and fauna of Californai in general, This would be irreparable damage and should be prevented at all costs. Mary Litell Oakland, CA   This is a travesty. This area needs to be preserved, not destroyed. The effects of this thoughtless project will be devastating to the lives of the people and the surroundings at Mission San Antonio as well as to the Hermitage at Lucia in the Big Sur area. Thousands of people from around the country have grown closer to God because of the beauty and the quite surroundings of the Hermitage. This is a sacred place to many people. To destroy it and pollute it with the noise and disturbance of a bombing ranged is a sacrilege. What possible good can come from this? Mary Ellen Quint, PhD. Phoenix, AZ 85004
	Cost savings in jet fuel, etc. are a terrible reason to destroy the sanctity of this area. Lynda Witzel Pacifica, CA
	If bombing is in fact necessary to the US military, surely both the government and the citizens can together agree on a more appropriate location. Fay Botham Glendale, CA

Noise from the bombing and from the airplanes will destroy the serenity and wilderness feeling of the area to the west of the reservation. There are Indian ceremonial grounds at the Wagons and Santa Lucia Peak used for comtemplation and respectfulness to the elders and hiking trails through the Ventana Wilderness used for reflection and retreat. I think that by changing the aesthetic quality and disturbing the air quality of this place, you may be in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which seeks to protect such things. Just because there aren't many people there, doesn't make it the perfect place for a bombing range. Precisely because it lacks development is what makes it such a specially peaceful place. Precisely because it is remote is what makes it so appealing for aesthetic and religious pursuits. It has value because it is empty of vibrations, resonance and other auditory disturbances caused by bombs and airplanes. Jane Strong Monterey Park Please don't bomb here. Kriya Bahn Santa Cruz, CA

Being a decendant of the Salinan Nation, and all that our families have gone threw and how far we have come, this proposal tears me up inside. Even though all kinds of laws have been passed to protect the Indians, here we the Salinan Nation stands again against the Military. No matter how you see it we have been hit from almost every direction. I was born in 1972 and I still till this day remember my Grandmother telling me not to tell anybody I was Indian. Only to survive, was I told this. It saddens me very deep, especially for my children. At what point do you ever think about the ones that got burned first, and are continuing to get burned, eventhough they thought they would have us content with all their so called NAGPRA laws. If you are Federally recognized does this help? If I am not understanding this correctly, maybe you could help me understand this absurd suggestion the Navy wants to do in our very sacred lands. We are not even allowed to go there because of the Military. Now you all want to blow it up. There is a lot of things that frusterate me with Hunter Liggett. I would really like to ask a lot of questions, one of these days, maybe I can find some strange kind of understanding to the Military wanting the Salinan Area so badly. Lee Ann Irvine Hubbard King City, CA.

This has always been a very peaceful and spiritual valley for myself and my family and friends and breaking that peace and calmness would just elimimate one more special place on the earth. laura edwards castroville, ca.	This is unnecessary,and will impact the quiet area including Immaculate Heart Hermitage, where I visit on religious retreats. The noise and disruption of increased sortie activity will disturb the life of the hermitage. I live in Northern California and ask that the Navy reconsider their plans, that they not make the area into more of a military training ground. Sound pollution, and other disturbances including the air traffic itself will disrupt and harm the natural and cultural historical character of the area as well. Thank you. Peter Menkin Larkspur, CA
You should pay attention to and respect such historically important areas and their heritage. Richard M. Smith Banning, CA,
It is unthinkable that the Navy would even consider an area adjacent to the pristine Ventana Wilderness as a possible site for practice bombing. If they can't find a more appropriate location, move Lemoore to Nevada... We would all be better off! George St. Clair Saratoga, CA	This area is so beautiful and peaceful. It is a real natural area representing what California used to be like and I sure hope it stays that way. I am totally against the Jet fighter bombing range proposed. Kerry Skyles Corralitos, CA

I believe that this bombing range will be extremely detrimental to the 14 California Condors that frequent the area as well as the Bald Eagles which are protected by the ESA. A lot of time and money has been spent on protecting the Condors and the Eagles. What is to become of them? To build the jet fighter bombing range is to be in violation of the ESA. I don't see any mitigating circumstances that would allow the Navy to damage the environment for these species. Almost as important is the noise and damage to the rustic beauty of the area which will be ruined for all time for human enjoyment if this bombing range is built. I visited this area in September 2000 and was very impressed with the biodiversity of flora and fauna present as well as the natural beauty of the scenery. This area needs to stay as it is with no new jet fighter target bombing range. Wendy Malmid Matawan, NJ

Fly jets directly over a Benedictine hermitage, not to mention other centers for spiritual retreat in Big Sur area? Disturb the peace of a region where both humans and wildlife need it the most? You can't possibly be serious! What a terrible idea... how can I help stop it? Danni Bayles-Yeager Los Angeles

Jesus christ, you might as well go bomb Yosemite! How many more bombing ranges do we need anyway? At least pick some place that's already trashed! Ariel Paulson Desert CA

I strongly urge you not to establish a jet fighter bombing range in San Antonio Valley. This is a prestine wilderness area that needs to be kept in tack and not disturbed. Please do not used this wilderness area as a bombing range. It would certainly destroy the habitat and endanger the animal, birds, and other creatures living in the area. This would create havoc among all living creatures especially the Christian monks who live close to the proposed site. The low-flying aircraft and noise from bombing would interfer with their contemplativelifestyle of prayer. Tom Olson Merced, CA	The area around and including Fort Hunter Ligett has too many historical, natural and sacred sites to be "blown away" as a bombing site. Peter Gibson The propsed site is too near the Big Sur wilderness; it especially affects the Camaldolese Benedictine hermitage there. The monks need the silence that the area provides. Homer S. White Sadieville, KY 40370
Big Sur has always been a natural splendor. The new adventure seeking tourist, as well as all travellers, would describe that whole area as some kind of heaven. It's sad and almost surreal that something so harmless yet so prestine and so alive would be a target. Jolon Grymaloski Vancouver, BC	San Antonio Valley and Big Sur are certainly one of California's (and America's) most beautiful, unique, and treasured natural wonders. To create a military bombing site would destroy much of the beauty and disrupt the serenity of the surrounding areas. Jeffrey Rice Atlanta, GA
This National forest area must be preserved protected and cherished. The impact of the Naval activity will surely have devastating effects on the wildlife, plant life and our ability to enjoy this precious and delicate national treasure. Victor Adintr Campbell CA	Aside from the appalling ecological and psychological impact of sonic booms echoing over the Big Sur coast, the San Antonio valley has a historical association with John Steinbeck's works. Research on the location of my father-in-law's books shows that his short novel, To a God Unknown, was set in the valley west of the mission. I urge every one who loves Steinbeck Country to petition against this environmental horror. Nancy Steinbeck www.nancysteinbeck.com
The Navy should reconsider it's plan to create a bombing training site in the San Antonio Valley near the Big Sur / Ventana Wilderness areas. There are far too few natural, historical and culturally significant areas left in California, or even the U.S. to just arbitrarily transform them into wastelands when they are taken over by the military. Just being an environmentalist does not mean we are blind to the importance of having a well-trained, quick-responding, fully-developed military to handle any situations that threaten our great nation. But sometimes those threats come from within our nation, as the case with the San Antonio Valley, and the cry needs to go out to the public and careful consideration needs to be taken to rethink the military's plans and come up with a suitable alternative. If it's a matter of $3M/year in savings, I'm sure the American, or at least Californian tax payer wouldn't mind chipping in a few cents every year to spare our glorious and pristine recreational and wilderness areas. We all must remember how important a good balance is in nature and to keep that balance we need to preserve as much of the unadulterated areas that are still remaining in California, as well as the United States. Please do anything and everything you can, Mr. Farr and Navy Officials to see that this plan is revised and help us save our beautiful State. Deborah Moscoso	This is a beautiful and peaceful place. Millions of Californians visit this area every year to enjoy the peace and pristine beauty of Big Sur and the San Antonio Valley. Navy fighter and bombing training would shatter the peacefulness of this place. In addition, no environmental impact studies have been done. I think that if these are necessary before we build roads and homes, they certainly ought to be done before such destructive training actions are taken. Further, this is a high fire area. If sparks can set off thousands of acres, what are "practice bombs" going to do??? Must military priorities come before the priorities of the citizens of this state? Please don't turn this area into a practice bombing zone, or make it into a noisy area for navy fighters. Marie Schafle Moss Beach, Ca   I urge you: not to proceed with the proposal to establish a jet fighter bombing training range in San Antonio Valley. Michael Braude Menlo Park, CA

This valley is the site of the only Mission where an inkling can be had of what early California life was really like,in its peaceful grandeur, because of the undeveloped nature of the surrounding lands. A bombing range would completely destroy this quality. An irreplaceable piece of California history and beauty would be lost. Please reconsider this plan. Kay Spencer Soquel CA	The entire notion of a bombing range in Big Sur is an abomination. Big Sur is a treasure, a landmark, a hideaway, a sanctuary, a home to more creatures than we know of. How much more of this genocidal tendencies portrayed by mankind (I emphasize "man"kind) can this country get away with. Is anyone accountable for animal extinction and destruction of the environment? Please, Rep. Farr, be our voice, be our beacon to guide us towards the peace and comfort of a pristine Big Sur. Michael P Kelley Soquel, CA
Why pick this pristine and beautiful site to destroy with bombs? It is not a good land use for this beautiful area, which is much better served as a wilderness area, for hiking and nature studies. Lynne also wrote to Rep. Farr: Do whatever is necessary to stop this from becoming a reality in such a beautiful part of our state of California. To me, there is a much more lucrative and aesthetic use of this land as wilderness parkland. Increasingly in our country and in our state, overcrowding and overdevelopment is a major problem and citizens want and need wilderness areas to restore the spirit and feel a bonding with the natural environment. This area is rich in its diversity and a natural wonder. To think of using it for a bombing range is just unthinkable. Lynda Newton Marina del Rey, CA	I have lived near here for most of my adult life, and have viewed these valleys from the top of the Coast Range to the west and from within at Jolon, San Antonio Mission and Nacimiento Ferguson Road. It would truly be a cultural and environmental atrocity to do further damage to an area currently recovering from artillery practice and military trainings. The artillery practice could be seen and heard from Highway 1 on the coast and from Paso Robles and even Cambria at times. This is NO PLACE for a bombing range. It is too close to populated areas, sports and hunting activity and tourists. It is too small surrounded by these diverse uses to be practical. I doubt Californians would tolerate a bombing range within this type of landscape and considering existing nearby uses. I recommend the Navy seek other more remote sites. I understand the Salinan Native Americans are interested in this site. That sounds good to me and the Navy plan does not. Ms Tauria Linala San Luis Obispo, CA
The San Antonio Valley and Big Sur are certainly one of California's (and America's) most beautiful, unique, and treasured natural wonders. To create a military bombing site would destroy much of the beauty and disrupt the serenity of the surrounding areas. Jeffrey Rice Atlanta, GA 30306   This is an ill advised use for this area. Paul Olsen Scotts Valley, CA	My ancestors came to the Monterey area in the 1790s, the Santa Cruz family, and I know this area very well, having hiked all over the Hunter-Liggett facility and in the adjacent mountains. My father attended National Guard camp at Hunter-Liggett and I have visited the Mission many times. Please don't subject this beautiful area to this inappropriate use. The archaeological treasures of the Wagon Wheel Cave and other sites in the region demand that this bombing range proposal not go forward. The Honorable Art Goodtimes San Miguel County Board of Commissioners Telluride CO
I do not live in California, however I have visited and am familiar with the Big Sur area. I believe the area is as much a precious region of this country as any. It would be a shame if I were not able to bring my children to the sight to experience its beauty. While I understand military needs, I urge the Navy to do everything in its power to consider an alternate sight. Stuart Tendler Hewitt, TX	It's past time for you, Rep. Farr, to recognize that the Salinan Nation should take over the stewardship and ownership of FHL by being granted Federal recognition as a tribe and regranted ownership of FHL. We know how to care for and protect our land far better than does anyone else, including the National Park Service. It's time for the US to return FHL to the Salinans! Respectfully yours, Debra Krol Phoenix, AZ

It is counter productive for the U.S. Navy to practice-bomb such a fragile beautiful area. The purpose of government entities are to protect us, not work against us. Pam Pedersen Escondido, CA	Any citizen of this country, including the people who are proposing this site, really love this country. When there are miles and miles of unusable land in Texas, Utah, New Mexico, Nevada that is neither beautiful, nor desirable, why select a pristine setting like San Antonio Valley? Whose interest are the military decision makers serving? Doesn't anyone care about the beautiful wilderness areas that have managed to survive? Patricia Dowd Oxnard, CA
TRY BOMBING AT YOUR NEVADA FACILITIES WHERE THERE IS NOTHING BUT SAGE AND DESERT. N. Challis Macpherson Venice, California
There are less sensitive areas,although the act of bombing any place is bound to have a negative impact. Perhaps computer simulated runs would be better for all concerned. Scott Woodruff Pescadero, Ca.
	This is one of the few areas of coastline in California left undeveloped, and it is a precious recreation area to Northern and Southern Californians alike, as well as visitors from all over the world traveling to and through the Monterey area. Suzanna

Thank for providing a place where those of us opposed to the proposed U.S. Navy bombing site can communicate with you. I hope you are one us who treasure beautiful places and untouched areas, as it will make writing you so much easier. This breathtakingly beautiful place and surrounding areas, like Big Sur and the Northern California coast line, is simply our favorite place to be in the world. My husband and I often take road trips along the back roads there and stay as long as we can at a Big Sur campsite. The peace and serenity of the mountains and trees is restorative. My husband is a Viet Nam vet, and continues to suffer from PTSD and memories of the Ia Drang Valley conflict in 1965, which for him have been tortuous. To go to these wilderness areas reaches a deep place inside him and he comes away with a more peaceful and healthy and hopeful view of the future. I think it would be unbearably sad to think of naval bombing missions over this beloved place. Lynda Newton	It would be a sad outrage if, in the name of protecting America, the Navy were to destroy one of its more precious natural and spiritual preserves. The sonic pollution alone would have this effect, not to mention other forms of destruction. I would like to see the Navy live up to the nobler aspects of its heritage by showing some farsightedness and scientific discernment in this matter. Katherine L. Ziegler Santa Cruz, CA
	To establish a jet fighter bombing range in San Antonio Valley would be to drastically disturb the peacefulness & rare beauty of the entire area of this national forest and the wilderness areas. Lynn Mary Ruth Olson San Luis Obispo, Ca
The first time I passed through this valley, I found it almost by accident and I was absolutely amazed at how such a pristine, untouched, and gloriously beautiful place could rest so incredibly close to my home in the Bay Area. I knew immediately as I descended into San Antonio Valley on that spring afternoon that I had discovered a rare jewel of a valley, the likes of which I have not come across anywhere else in my explorations of California. I want to go back there and learn more about this place, to show my friends and perhaps someday my children what a virtually untouched and unspoiled coastal valley is like, and what much of California must have looked like before the population explosion. I feel that the conversion of this space for military operations would destroy a unique opportinuty for present and future Californians to discover how unique and stunning the natural beauty of their state really is. Surely there must be other lands in this state that could serve equally well for military use without destroying one of the last undeveloped pockets of land in California that is easily accessible from a major population center. Thank you for taking the time to read the opinions and thoughts of myself and other concerned California residents regarding this matter. Dan Ackerman Concord, CA	This would be an utterly inappropriate insult to one of the most beautiful and important places in the U.S. and an insult to all Americans who treasure our irreplaceable natural heritage and want to preserve it for future generations. Dr. Mha Atma S. Khalsa Los Angeles
	San Antonio Valley is a pristine area that should be protected. Being under military control has actually preserved a habitat that in most other areas of California has been destroyed through development. It also has great historical value. This area should absolutely not be destroyed; rather, it should be preserved for future generations. Diana Roberts Point Richmond, CA
	This is something that should be considered for the state of Alaska. Not the US mainland. Mary Higgins Bouz Sundre, Alberta, Canada I grew up in Carmel and spent much of my youth hiking and camping near the area that is now being proposed as a Navy bombing range. One of the things I remember most about those outings was the total peace and quite of the place and how far away I felt from all the noise of civilization. How will that be possible with 3000 F-16s and F-18s screaming over head each year to drop 10 to 25 pound chunks of steel on a target that they hopfully will not miss. That missing part is also of great concern for me since a naval officer described it recently as "kindergarten training". Walter Charles Gorey Venice, Ca.

I'll let this poem express the way I feel. April is the greatest month; Full of vibrant energy, Full of wails and groans Of Nature giving birth To lushness.  ("And the Spirit of God Was stirring above The Waters.") I feel it in my sentient being; The earth is trembling with emotion, Sweating, crying, pleading to her young To thrust upwards.  Why do you generate, oh Earth? Why do you generate your young; Nourishing them within you And forcing them To thrust upwards?

Is it that -- things in motion Tend to stay in motion, Or on account of men Who trample you? Men claim to be your midwives, Little do they care for you; Instead of harvesting they rape you, Blasting out your bowels With bombs. They smear your face with blood, They dilute your streams with tears, They gouge out your eyeballs With little care. Why then do your generate, oh Earth? Why do you generate for men? Could it be -- could it be today What happened long ago, That the Spirit of God Is stirring...? Jim MacMath Trumbull, CT

The sound of war machines adjacent to the beauty of the land and the solace many of us gain from the nearby Camaldolese Hermitage seems criminal. I consider it theft and vandalism of great magnitude. Ruthie Moccia Columbia, MO	This is a horrible abuse of assumed power. Ethically humans must act rightly towards other humans, creatures and the environment. This proposed action would in effect negate the rights of others to exist, live, and flourish. Enough of this non-sense! There are military ranges enough. I live by one!!! And think of the waste of money that could be used to benefit the environment and those in it! Christopher Jensen Lusby, MD
The integrity of this natural area, as well as the long-standing contemplative life of the Camaldolese Monks make a bombing range a serious error in judgement. We have so few places left with such biodiversity that it is our obligation to preserve them. Mary E. Halpin Laramie, Wyoming	Big Sur, Ventana and the San Antonio Valley are a rare and wonderfull gift from nature on our California coast. In a world where humankind is totally unconscious of it's massive desimation of the earth and it's delicate balance, this intent by the US military is obscene cannot be tolerated. It must stop! Leave the Big Sur alone! Richard Joseph Wheeler Berkeley, California
I urge you: not to proceed with the proposal to establish a jet fighter bombing training range in San Antonio Valley. Patty Petersen Salinas, Ca	I would be very disappointed in the US Navy's building a range that would affect the peace and solitude that people escape to the region to experience. I for one will travel 12 hours door to door to visit the Hermitage that is located just south of Big Sur. I know already the sounds of the jets overhead and feel that they are a real disturbance just as they exist today. I can imagine the conseuences once the range is built. Besides my peace being disturbed, though, I feel that the negative effects of the project to the people and wildlife who live here or visit the area for the same reasons I do is significant enough to look at an alterative Thomas Mulligan Lincolwood, IL
The Navy needs to open themselves to a shift in perspective that would facililtate a "new pair of glasses" as it relates to understanding the implications of test bombing in the close proximity to such awonder as Big Bur/Ventana Wilderness. The Hermitage retreat center is of particular interst to me as a person who cherishes Silence and its healing powers. I acnnot imagine hearing F18s blast by three time a day...during a mediation retreat... I understand the need for military training and support such but NOT in this area. I can only hope the Navy reconsiders and finds a mor eappropriate site for its training... Sean Casey Leclaire Harvard, Ma
Any widerness area in this country or any area of any country should be protected from any bombing by any country. peace keith mather daly city CA.	I would hate to see the environment polluted by the jet fighter bombing range. There are plants that are native to this area that could be negatively impacted by the pollution from jet fuel. The quietness of the area also will be jepordized by the sounds of the jet fighters which would imact the Mission San Antonio, Immaculate Heart Hermitage, and Tassajara Monastery. Janet Strong Yakima, WA

 

The Big Sur area has been a place of retreat and renewal for my family since 1969. There are few places left that have maintained their prestine wilderness qualities. I urge you to reconsider your plans for the development of a bombing range in this area. Please respect the people who travel from all over the world to come to this beautiful area and listen to the many who want to maintain this natural area with all its beauty just the way it is. Thankyou. Betty Webb Pecharich San Pedro, California,	This is one of the most beautiful and peaceful areas in the US. Surely, in a time of peace, it is unnecessary to upset a natural environment in this way? Big Sur is also the home of a Camoldolese Monastery; does the peace of this place need to be sacrificed this way? Surely the Navy's training needs can be accomodated without the damage to the environment -- not just plant and animal life, but the peace and silence which humans treasure as well. Jeanne Edna Thelwell Brooklyn, NY
Dear Mr. Secretary, Such a bombing range would damage not only the environment but the silence and beauty of at least 2 Catholic retreats, Mission San Antonio de Padua & New Camaldoli Hermitage. Please find a less delicate site for your training. Thank you. Kathleen Ann Clarke Moraga, CA     To destroy pristine wilderness is to destroy something sacred. There are few places of such natural beauty and silence available to us and to the creatures of the wild as the San Anonio Valley and Big Sur coast. Please do not take them from us in order to train for war! New Camadoli Monastery nearby is a place of refuge and spiritual renewal for so many. It is also the home of monks who have chosen to spend their lives there. Too many supersonic jets already interrupt the prayerful quiet without your adding to the disturbance. I beg of you, please do not go ahead with your plans for the San Antonio Valley! Carole Marie Kelly Carmel, CA	Above and beyond all the many, many solid reasons given by so many people for the Navy to scrap this idiotic idea, it should be obvious to any reasonable and conscientious citizen that there are, without question, plenty of other sites to choose from -in remote, desolate areas! How can anyone seriously consider such an abominable and foolish idea - to set up a bombing range in such a beautiful area deserving of stringent protection?! It is not only nature, ecology, archaeology, and all the other obvious harms, but consider also the religious communities there (such as the Camaldoles Benedictine monks and their guests at New Camaldoli, Immaculate Heart Hermitage) whose peace and tranquility would be horribly damaged, and while some might think that communities of human beings devoted "only" to prayer are not worthy of consideration to halt a major military enterprise like this, prayer is the one thing that makes life worthwhile for ALL of us, whether in war or peace,! under any and all circumstances. Prayer seems like almost nothing to the gross mind and heart "buried in flesh" but prayer is the most valuable reality in human existence! Consider the peace of those communities and monasteries in the Big Sur - Ventana San Antonio Valley region. Move the whole range plan to an area that will not be sonegatively affected. Please! In the name of all that is beautiful, good and right and true! Will McKinley Santa Clarita, CA
To keep our Navy strong we must provide for Naval Air to be capable. That takes practice. It would be nice to attain the basic practice at as a reasonable price as practical, with due consideration to the area affected. The times I have spent at Hunter Liggett and Mission San Antonio have always been enjoyable in many ways. The helicopters, experimental Army activities, and the public campground behind the mission did not detract. Nor do I think that a few jet flights per day will detract. In short, I think the target range should be established for the Navy. James Payne Los Altos,	please rethink your decision to use this sacred area as a practice area for your war games. jo-ann lucero felton ca   Consider our grandchildren. Will they ever see this beauty? I know you think that this is the way to protect us all but consider what it is you want to protect. If we destroy the beauty God gave us what have we left to protect? I will die. You will die. Must beauty also die or can we leave it for those who follow. Please reconsider. Deborah A. Harriss Vacaville, CA
This would be destructive to the natural setting. It would also compromise the contemplative atmosphere of the New Camaldoli Hermitage where I am an oblate and often go to appreciate the solitude and silence of God's Creation. Navy planes would be a terrible distraction in that beautiful space. Rev. Patrick W. Collins, Ph.D. Douglas MI   We strongly oppose the bombing range proposal for all of the obvious problems it will cause to the natural environment. In addition the noise pollution incurred by the jets will greatly disturb the enjoyment by humans of a very large section of the beautiful California coast. There is a Camaldolese Benedictine Hermitage just located between Ft. Hunter Liggett and the ocean. The noise from the jets will destroy the contemplative atmosphere enjoyed now by the monks of this monastery and by their guests, who number in the hundreds each year. Mr. & Mrs. James E. Burns Manhattan Beach   It would be disastrous to have a jet fighter bomber range in that area. As frequent visitors to Big Sur we strongly object to this plan, since it would destroy the tranqyility and peace so much needed and enjoyed by the residents and visitors to that area. It is one of the few remaining unspoiled parts of nature so badly needed by plants, animals and humans alike. Alexander and Ruth Maria Lipski Long Beach,	I request that you cease plans to establish a jet fighter bombing range in San Antonio Valley. Instead, begin plans to protect and preserve this unique, precious and irreplaceable natural wonder of California. I have several concerns re the damage that the bombing range will unleash: Noise of low flying navy jets are incompatible with the Ventana Wilderness, where folks go for peace and QUIET. This area is essential condor habitat. There is a wonderful Camoldese hermitage and retreat center in neighboring Big Sur whose serentiy would be shattered by the noise of the jets. Spiritual retreats need quiet places and the hermitage has been established for well over 20 years. Habitat would be destroyed that would take years to rectify. Witness the years taken to slowly reclaim parts of San Clemente Island. An avid outdoor hiker, I onced hiked a wilderness area in Washington State, that was a flyway for the jets stationed at Whidbey Island. The noise from those jets was excruciating and scary. It seemed like I was in a VietNam War movie. Id hate to see a similar natural setting ruined. Please remember and value that wilderness is not replaceable in our lifetimes. Wilderness must be be preserved. Thanks. Kerry Halligan ALameda CA
Big Sur, Ventana and the San Antonio Valley are a rare and wonderful gift from nature on our California coast. In a world where humankind is totally unconscious of it's massive desimation of the earth and it's delicate balance, this intent by the US military is obscene cannot be tolerated. It must stop! Leave the Big Sur alone! Richard Joseph Wheeler Berkeley, California	Plans for a bombing range in that part of the coast is unthinkable. Aside from the disruption of the eco-system,there are monastic instutions which would greatly suffer. Don't do it Jerome Henry Farmington, Missouri

It would be most gracious of the Navy, an enormous an sophisticated organization with numerous sites here and abroad to facilitate fighter pilot training, not to select a site which, because of its historical, cultural, natural, and spiritual uniqueness, makes it a matter of anguished concern to a substantial number of tax-paying, patriotic citizens that it not be chosen for a jet fighter bombing range. There is simply no way the Navy's needs in this situation can do anything but damage and violence to those who would otherwise have little cause to oppose its legitimate activities. This area is utterly unique in the Western United States, a site of pilgrimage for all kinds of people who value natural and spiritual beauty. I have taken my family there on numerous ocassions, expressly for the purpose of experiencing what can be found in few other places in the region. Surely, the selection must be an oversite which a little education and inspection would rectify without much controversy. If it is the purpose of the Navy to keep the peace, it might begin by keeping it at home. I urge those who may have made this decision without regard for its unfortunate collateral consequences to reconsider any and all practical alternatives, and will give whatever assitance I can to such a process. This is not a wise decision and it must be opposed at all costs. Francis X. McCarthy El Dorado Hills, Ca.	Let's support life and the consistent celebration of joy nature offers us. There are certainly other ways and places to practice "bombing". Kyle King Santa Cruz, CA To distroy such a beautiful valley would be horrific. To disturb the hermitage near by is unthinkable. There is open uninhabited land in New Mexico, Texas and Oklahoma....look there and NOT the San Antonio Valley. Ronna Riley Westlake Village, CA   The military needs to shrink, not expand. The US needs to be peaceful, not warlike. The US' enemies are there because of our own arrogance. The US needs to learn how to be humble. Reconciliation is better than miliatry spending, and costs less. Spending more on war only causes more conflicts, and does not prevent any. Kenji Liu Oakland, CA
There are few places left like the San Antonio Valley. To disturb that kind of peace, and to affect that environment in any way, when there is no demonstrable need, would be a travesty. Nathanael C. Bacon San Francisco, CA	Please preserve the pristine wilderness of the San Antonio Valley. It is the kind of gift we should offer our children and future generations. Let us not contaminate this area with the noise and pollution that would result from such a poor choice on behalf of the US Navy. Please take our opinions seriously! Mayra Bacon San Francisco, CA
I register my complete opposition to the planned desecration and permanent damage by the propsed Naval Bombing Range in the San Antonio Valley to the priceless treasures of the Ventana Wilderness, Big Sur Coast and New Camaldoli Hermitage. I also strongly support the immediate cessation of all overflights being conducted over the said national/world treasures especially New Camaldoli Hermitage, a place for retreat for people of all faiths and all walks of life. Surely the good people of the US military also are moved by a true appreciation and deep respect for America itself. If that is not present, what will be left in our society that is worth defending for its own intrinsic good - that is the land and sky and sea? There are so few places that remain today where all Americans can enjoy and benefit from blessed natural silence! In conclusion, let us protect and reverence the precious Central Big Sur Coast and environs now and forever for our grandchildren. Lawrence. G. Muller Winchester, Virginia	The whole notion of using Big Sur or any part of it as a bomb site is obscene and cannot be tolerated. Richard J. Wheeler Berkeley, Calif
	The San Antonio Valley is breathtakingly beautiful and an important natural resource. Please do not establish--not even go on thinking about establishing--a jet fighter bombing range there. Jennifer Harford Philadelphia, PA
	Please do not proceed with the plan. You may not believe, but the peace and prosperity of your country, and also of the whole world, are more on the shoulder of Camaldoli hermits than that of the U.S. navy. Madeleine Tanaka Oxford, United Kingdom
Though there is clearly a need for a practice range to enable the training of pilots, this is not the place. The area in question is one of the last remaining large parcels of this unique type of ecosystem. The Central Coast of CA is experiencing tremendous growth, and as the growth continues, the presence of the bombing range will be increasingly at conflict with the needs of the public at large. This type of installation should be located in a area that is sparsely populated, and not so environmentally sensitive. THIS IS NOT THE PLACE! Michael Curry Santa Maria, CA
	Please understand this is not just a case of "not in my backyard." The area in question is one which, for anyone who has ever been fortunate enough to have visited, a source of peace just to think about, and to look forward to going again. There really is no other place like it, and to propose what you have proposed to do in this unique natural haven is almost like a joke, almost like you just wanted to see if anyone was paying attention. We are! Please take heed. Raise our taxes to make up for the 3 million a year you would have saved, but don't destroy this area! Marilyn Russell Los Angeles   This would be detrimental to the local environment. My family owned some of this land that was consumed by Hunter Ligget. This land has a rich history in California and should be kept as pristine as possible for future generations. Marilyn Gooding West Covina, CA   No training sorties should be flown in any area of big sur or the ventana wilderness. find another place david mucha south pasadena ca
I ask you to take a moment and think of all the natural environments that have survived relatively unharmed up to this point. Now think of how large or small these areas truly are. This area of the central coast of California has been to this point a vast expanse of land allowed to preserve its timeless truth. This has been due to a combination of parklands, the vast private holdings of individuals such as William Randolph Hearst, and the respect of local inhabitants who know how to live in an area without harming it. By allowing bombing practice on this pristine land the Navy will rape this area which is so unique not just in California, but in the world. I believe that we should have a strong national defense, and I do realize that that requires certain sacrifices. I also believe that the Big Sur area is among the worst choices for this range. I urge the Navy to choose another location, such as isolated desert or lands that have already been destroyed. Leave this piece of heaven to everyone who knows it or will discover it. Erica Selin Boston, MA
The Central Coast is a National Treasure including Hunter-Liggett Reserve. I have visited the Mission, which is one of the most beautiful in the chain. It is also important because it gives one of the best insights into the life of the Mission Indians anywhere. I intend to visit the Hearst Lodge designed by Julia Morgan when that becomes possible. The Native American sites are fragile and important to all of us probably in many ways we are not even of aware of yet. They are important to the descendants of these people who have so little of their past left and the sites are also archeologically important. The ecology of the area is beautiful, fragile and should be preserved as all of California is gobbled up by over-development. It is a rare reminder of what Old California was like. There most certainly will be percussion damage by the bombing practice, stray dummy bomb damage and overflight damage by aircraft in the area including noise pollution in a previously quiet area. Don't let this go forward and then discover the damage later when it cannot be reversed. There are many other areas not so sensitive or already ruined by these types of practices where this can go on. Of course, the Navy may save a few bucks. That is not important considering the damge will be permanent and is avoidable. There is also a surplus of upwards of 5 Trillion dollars of federal money overcharged to the people of this country. The Navy can make use of some of that money to do bombing practice a couple hundred miles away. We own a house on the Central Coast and plan on moving there soon. We are looking forward to living in and being part of a community in one of the best regions in the world. We should all try to leave as much of it as unspoiled as possible. I believe the Hunter-Liggett Reserve is so important that it should be turned over to a Park Sevice system or a Land Conservancy group as soon a possible. Karen Brandt Yorba Linda, Ca.   I am not opposed to military training grounds. But I am opposed to defiling a spiritual and natural resource as is now being proposed near Big Sur. It is difficult to understand -- the Navy deserves a big thanks for preserving the grounds they've held, but now is about to trash this sanctuary? The impact of low flying jets on the surrounding area will be enormous. I cannot believe that we need a new bombing site, let alone that nowhere else is better suited. Please don't do this. It will leave a scar on both the lovers of Big Sur, as well as on the Navy. Michael Karagosian Calabasas, CA	The Big Sur wilderness area is one of the last pristine areas available for spiritual and social renewal of American citizens. It is irreplaceable. It is not just "open wilderness" but is spiritual home to Native Americans, Catholic retreatants, and New Age visitors to the Esalen Center. Surely there are other wilderness areas where Naval exercises would not be so out-of-place, so antithetical to the traditional uses of the land. Jean Holroyd-Sills Avenue, Los Angeles, CA
	There are too many hungry people and that you insist on such outrageous expenditures of energy and money that you should target the back yards of the jerks who come up with such proposalsinstead of places like San Antonio Valley. Mike Macon
	The Navy's proposal is UNCONSCIONABLE. The San Antonio Valley is a treasure that all Californians are proud of. Please exercise some humility, use a modicum of foresight, and explore other options for the location of this bombing range. To so violently disturb an ecological, archaeolgical, historical and cultural goldmine for something as banal as a testing range, and for something that essentially is supposed to PROTECT THE PUBLIC, would reflect minimal intelligence. Please open your eyes. Sue Giffin Los Angeles, CA
	Big Sur is a national treasure and it would be tragic to disturb the serene beauty of the environment. Please register my objection to a bombing range in the San Antonio Valley. Marjorie Schuman, Ph.D. Los Angeles, CA
Pick another spot where people and environment are not so closely involved. The Monastery at Big Sur is important to the whole World. Don't you see that?   Roland J. Dufour Weare, NH	Fort Hunter Ligget is used by many people for recreation, camping, and hunting. It is a beautiful, peaceful area with a lot of wildlife that would most likely be adversely affected by the proposed activity. Please reconsider your plans and protect this valuable natural resouce. Jeffrey D. Edwards San Francisco

As a 63-year-old California native, I have witnessed the decimation of wilderness, as well as the extinction of wildlife and native plants. Now the Navy wants to help demolish one of the last pristine and spiritual places in our state by flying sorties over and bombing Stoney Valley in San Antonio Valley and the Santa Lucias in the Ventana Wilderness area of Big Sur. With many other areas in our state available for drills that are not as ecologically sensitive or as full of already endangered wildlife to choose from, I implore the Navy to consider another location to fly over and drop their bombs. The Navy says this training plan would save resources and money. What resources would be saved? Not the wildlife, native grasses and ancient Oaks! Then there is the quiet beauty and spirituality which we all treasure in this place. Does the navy really believe that any amount of money saved could make up for destruction of one of the most beautiful andenvironmentally important places left in our state. Margaret Wallace Camarillo, CA

People come from all over the world to enjoy the pristine natural resources of the San Antonio Valley. There are few places remaining where one can enjoy such beautiful diversity in peace and solitude. Establishing a jet fighter bombing range would jeopardize this priceless national treasure and violate the rights of all who choose to enjoy it. I understand that the Navy will save some money by building a range here. But at what cost? In this case the safety of the ecosystem and the rights of both residents and visitors far outweigh the financial benefits of the plan. Natural resources are not renewable - once they are gone, they're gone forever. Please respect the wishes of the public in this matter by canceling your plan to build the bombing range in the San Antonio Valley. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Kresser Manhattan Beach, CA

The Ventana Wilderness is unique, both historically and biologically. The Navy already has two sites for bombing that are close enough to its bases. A distance of fifty or sixty miles doesn't make that much difference when you talk about a plane that flies 150 mph. Gene Stender San Clemente, Ca